incident. At the end of the prosecutions case, the defence will have an option either to plead guilty or make a submission of no case to answer. I can agamemnon critical essay therefore conclude that advocacy has a lot of elegance to it and a skillful barrister knows the timing as to when he should speak with more aggression and when to tone down in assisting the judge reach a correct decision. Although in a jury trial, the judge will relinquish the role of deciding the guilt of the accused to the jury, he plays a crucial role in directing the jury to the legal issues concerned and will play a residual role in sentencing when. However, the court applied the literal rule and ignored the legislation-the aim of the parliament 24 Nevertheless, the courts realised that the application of the literal rule will cause absurdity in some cases especially when the drafters of the legislation cannot foresee such circumstances. If the Literal rule produces an absurd result, which parliament could not have intended, then judges can substitute a reasonable meaning in the light of the statute as a whole 29 as can be seen in Keene v Muncaster . I found it quite strange how the two parties were next to each other. The judicial arrangement for the administration of criminal justice in United States is well known for its compactness and high standards of efficiency.
My report on court room observation focuses on observations from two courts. It houses the Manchester County Court and the Manchester District Registry of the High Court, as well as Manchester City Magistrates' Family Courts, the District Probate Registry and the Regional and Area. Essay Court Observation and over other 29,000 free term papers, essays and research papers examples are available on the website! My report on court room observation focuses on observations from two courts, Slough Magistrates court in the Thames Valley area and the Central.
Social security today essay thesis
Law vs ethics essay
We were waiting at the waiting room for the trail to start and few people were waiting for their trails with their representations. They play a starring role and in a criminal trial, it is the prosecution who will set the trial running in its motion by presenting the case against the accused. Moreover, the Americans lacked confidence in the theory of compare contrast essay between the parsons judicial precedent and therefore, preferred that juries who are the representatives of the people should control the judicial process rather than the Justices. One can say that the judge consults the barristers before deciding on a particular issue in the case. It was held that a jet-ski was a leisure device rather than a vessel utilised in sea-going navigation - an essential element in the definition of ship under the statute . But we can only take the intention of the Parliament from the words which they have used in the Act" 20 Therefore the Literal Rule requires strict, blinkered adherence to the actual express words used in a statute and that its interpretation must not vary.